Atoms and Heat

We saw that Conservation of Energy only worked once we could precisely account for transformations of other energies into ThermalE.

What is thermal energy?

How fast are atoms moving?

At room temperature, a typical speed is $v$ ~ 700 mi / h - close to the speed of sound.

This is no accident: Sound is a pressure disturbance travelling through air. It seems plausible that any disturbance should move with the same underlying speed as the atoms are moving.

What is this in miles / sec? ...and in sec / mile? This time, see WolframAlpha

.

Light travels at 3 X 10^8 m /sec = 186,000 miles/sec: much faster than sound.

Use this to figure out... How far away is this airplane?

By the way... According to this USA Today article, civil aircraft are hit on average once per aircraft per year. But lightning hasn't caused any airplane to crash since 1981.

 

Temperature

ThermometerThe metric system uses the Celsius degree to measure temperature.

0 C = water freezes = 32 F

100 C = water boils = 212 F

37 C = normal human body temperature = 98.6 F

40 C = bad fever = 104 F

1 C = 9/5 ${}^o$F~2${}^o$F

But what is temperature?

Thermal energy is the disorganized kinetic energy of atoms.

Why don't we have any hydrogen in our atmosphere?

Hydrogen is the most abundant atom in the universe. 70.6% of the atoms in our solar system are hydrogen:

[David Arnett]

Jupiter's atmosphere: 90% is $H_2$.

Saturn: 75% $H_2$.

Earth: 0.000055 % $H_2$.

??

The nature of temperature

Actually, Temperature is not proportional to the average speed of molecules, it is proportional to the average kinetic energy:

$$T\propto {\rm KineticE} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2.$$

If two atoms have the same kinetic energy (that is, the same temperature), but different masses, which one is moving faster?

Hydrogen gas ($H_2$) has an atomic weight of 2 grams / mole.

Nitrogen gas ($N_2$) has an atomic weight of 28 grams / mole. So, one nitrogen molecule has a mass of 14 times the mass of a hydrogen molecule.

If we have any hydrogen in the atmosphere along with the 78% of our atmosphere that's nitrogen, how much faster is the hydrogen moving?

$$\frac{1}{2}m_{H_2} v_{H_2}^2=\frac{1}{2}14*m_{H_2}(760 {\rm mph})^2.$$

With a little algebra...(and help from Google) $$v_{H_2} = \sqrt{14}*760 {\rm mph}= 2,844 mph = 1.3 km /sec.$$

This is about 10% of the escape velocity -- 11 km/sec -- from earth.

So occasionally, a hydrogen molecule will get going fast enough to reach escape velocity.

Remember this: at the same temperature, light atoms move faster than heavy atoms

Atmospheres of the planets

Extra credit assignment

We think the planets all formed from the same kind of dust--with roughly the same chemical composition, and yet their atmospheres are quite different--as we've seen with hydrogen. Let's see if we can account for another gas that's present on some planets and not on others:

  1. Look up the atmospheric composition of the two other, most earthlike planets--Venus and Mars. What is the most common gas in their atmosphere? (I'll call it "gas X").
  2. What is the percentage of Earth's atmosphere that gas X makes up? Wow, isn't that radically different from Mars and Venus? Maybe Earth once had a lot of that gas too. But we also have life on Earth. How might life account for the fact that we have very little of gas X, but have a lot of oxygen--which is hardly present at all on any other planet?
  3. Now find the three most common gases in Jupiter's and Saturn's atmospheres. Any gas X to be seen?
  4. Look up the the boiling point of gas X, and the surface temperatures of Saturn and Jupiter. It may be that you find one in C and another in K: convert to the same temperature system so you can compare. E.g. Google "20 degrees C in degrees K". If one of these planets started with a lot of gas X at one point in time, what might have happened to it that it can't be found in the atmosphere? Where else (or in what form) might it still be present on Jupiter or on Saturn?

Absolute zero

So as you cool things down, the atoms are moving slower and slower. At a certain temperature they would stop completely:

-273 C = absolute zero

This is the basis of the Kelvin temperature scale: the degrees are the same size, but the zero point is absolute zero.

Room temperature = 20 C = 273 + 20 = 293 K.

There is a very simple formula relating kinetic energy per molecule to temperature (in Kelvin) it is...

$$K.E. = 2 \times 10^{-23} T_K.$$

So, the formula for thermal energy is related to the $N$--number of molecules-- and the temperature (in degrees Kelvin), like this

$$ThermalE = 2 \times 10^{-23} NT_K.$$

Which has more thermal energy? A mug of hot chocolate or a mug of ice water?

A mug of hot coffee or Lake Michigan at room temperature?

The Lake, even though it's at a lower temperature, still has lots more microscopic kinetic energy then a mere mug of hot coffee because the number of molecules $N$ in the lake is so much larger.

Thermal expansion or contraction?

In general... do things get bigger or smaller when you heat them?

The most familiar thermometers depend on a change in volume of alcohol (colored red). Years ago mercury was used. The glass enclosing the alcohol is also expanding. But not nearly as much as the alcohol.


Thermal expansion/contraction is the reason we put neat cracks into sidewalks, and complicated cracks ("expansions joints") into bridges.

If you have a lid that's too tight Should you run hot water on the jar or the lid??


Loosening lids by running under hot water uses thermal expansion.

Close fitting ball and ring... What happens if you

Ball & ring demo

Typical thermal expansions are around... $$\frac{\Delta V}{V} =~ 10^{-4} / {}^o C$$ This means, if you increase the temperature by 1 degree C, the volume will increase fractionally by 1/10,000

Global warming and thermal expansion

Current predictions for average warming due to excess $CO_2$ are 2-4 C by 2100.

Even if all the ice (and glaciers) did *not* melt, the ocean could still rise due to thermal expansion. How much? Taking the higher value of $\Delta T = 4$ C,

Water has an expansion coefficient at room temperature of $ \frac{\Delta V}{V} = 2.0 \times 10^{-4} / {}^o C$ and the oceans have an average depth of 12,000 feet.

If the ocean is like a glass which is filled to a depth $h$,

$$\begin{align}\Delta h & = h \cdot 2.0 \times 10^{-4} \cdot \Delta T \\ &=(12,000 ft)(2.0 \times 10^{-4})(4 C) = 9.6 {\rm \ feet}\end{align}.$$ This is enough to be worrisome.

The IPCC has done a more detailed calculation. Luckily:

Their prediction is a maximum rise of 1.9 feet. If you add in the effect of polar ice melting, the maximum sea level is more like 2.5 feet.

You can explore the effect of a 3 ft rise with this Google Maps sea level simulator.

 

Image credits

thermometer, Martin LaBar, Acoustics.org, Hubble Space Telescope, Cassini, Wiki: Brockert, C. R. NaveRowan Atkinson, Nicki Varkevisser, Natural Env. Research Council, National Magnet Lab