|
sometimes lead to greater distancing before they evolve into deeper levels of faith.
believe firmly that we can critique and challenge and still respect and love others, and we can do the same with Scripture. As professors, we try to model lives and perspectives which raise the tough questions, but do so within the context of a deep commitment to biblically grounded faith. We do not worship the Bible, but we discover the God whom we worship in its pages. We hope we can inspire in students confidence in the integrity and goodness of the biblical tradition, and that we can model for them a faith which suggests that the Bible can stand up to honest, searching questions.
approaching the Bible through critical, scholarly lenses -- could also maintain or develop an ability and a commitment to use the Bible devotionally. we don't work on this enough in our setting, or at least not in the classroom, where we focus less on personal edification and more on faithful academic approaches to the text. And perhaps in the midst of discovering new methodologies for reading the Bible, we lose sight of Scripture's simple meaning.
analysis of the text. Our books and our methods are all essential, I believe. But we trust that students also will read the Bible, at other times, purely for inspiration and edification, or that they can hear it read aloud, and can feed it in public worship. Early Benedictine monks, whose spiritual disciplines and scholarship were admirable, essentially memorized large portions of Scripture by hearing and repeating it daily. Sometimes they were known as the |