1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
have become so tied to its international program that a few faculty members have asked whether, in the college's communal self-identity and values, international education has not moved above the Mennonite church connection. It is a fair question. |
||||||||
|
--Theron F. Schlabach, GC professor of history1 |
||||||||
internationally educating their charges through both curricular alterations and study-abroad programs. Impetus for such education is multiplex. For some, the simple recognition that the U.S. is "behind" other countries in internationalizing its institutions of higher education is sufficient: western European countries, Japan and other nations have educated for interdependence, the failure of the U.S. to do so will "irreversibly diminish its
2Statement from the Advisory Council for International Exchange, cited in
|
||||||||